Hi Blog,
As I told you earlier, there is so much to learn in this book. On the subject of history, Russel has written a chapter named "History as an Art" but has maintained in the chapter that history is both, science and an art. He talks about importance of reading history to get a picture of whole humanity, to think as Man and not man. This will free us from our emotional prejudices. Then he talks about the decrease in number of readers and writers in the domain of history. Towards the end of chapter, he just can't hold it anymore, Russel talks about the condition of humanity in modern world which makes an interesting read. Here is an excerpt:
"I think that in bringing sanity to our intoxicated age, his-
Cornford's thesis that Thucydides modeled his history on
liquidated; if a prophet were to arise in the West, he would
As I told you earlier, there is so much to learn in this book. On the subject of history, Russel has written a chapter named "History as an Art" but has maintained in the chapter that history is both, science and an art. He talks about importance of reading history to get a picture of whole humanity, to think as Man and not man. This will free us from our emotional prejudices. Then he talks about the decrease in number of readers and writers in the domain of history. Towards the end of chapter, he just can't hold it anymore, Russel talks about the condition of humanity in modern world which makes an interesting read. Here is an excerpt:
"I think that in bringing sanity to our intoxicated age, his-
tory has an important part to play. I do not mean that this
is
to be brought about by any supposed "lessons of
history,"
or indeed by anything easily put into a verbal formula. What
history can and should do, not only for historians but for
all
whose education has given them any breadth of outlook, is to
produce a certain temper of mind, a certain way of thinking
and feeling about contemporary events and their relation to
the
past and the future. I do not know whether one should accept
Attic tragedy; but, if he did, the events that he recorded
fully
justified his doing so, and the Athenians, if they had seen
themselves in the light of actors in a possible tragedy,
might
have had the wisdom to avert the tragic outcome. It is an
ancient doctrine that tragedy comes of hubris, but it is
none
the less true for being ancient, and hubris recurs in every
age
among those who have forgotten the disasters to which it has
always led. In our age, mankind collectively has given
itself
over to a degree of hubris surpassing everything known in
former ages. In the past, Prometheus was regarded as a
would-be liberator, restrained in his beneficent work by the
tyranny of Zeus, but now we begin to wish that there were
some Zeus to restrain the modern followers of Prometheus.
Prometheus aimed to serve mankind: his modern followers
serve the passions of mankind, but only in so far as they
are
mad and destructive. In the modern world there are clever
men in laboratories and fools in power. The clever men are
slaves, like Djinns in the Arabian Nights. Mankind collec-
tively, under the guidance of the fools and by the ingenuity
of
the clever slaves, is engaged in the great task of preparing
its
own extermination. I wish there were a Thucydides to treat
this theme as it deserves. I cannot but think that if the
men
in power were impregnated with a sense of history they would
find a way of avoiding the catastrophe which all see
approach-
ing and which none desire, for history is not only an
account
of this nation or that, nor even of this continent or that;
its
theme is Man, that strange product of evolution which has
risen by means of skill to a mastery over all other forms of
life, and even, at great peril to himself, to mastery over
the
forces of inanimate nature. But Man, in spite of his
cleverness,
has not learned to think of the human family as one. Al-
though he has abolished the jungle, he still allows himself
to
be governed by the law of the jungle. He has little sense of
the common tasks of humanity, of its achievements in the
past and its possible greater achievements in the future. He
sees his fellow man not as a collaborator in a common pur-
pose, but as an enemy who will kill if he is not killed.
What-
ever his sect or party may be, he believes that it embodies
ultimate and eternal wisdom, and that the opposite party
embodies ultimate and absolute folly. To any person with
any historical culture such a view is absurd. No portion of
mankind in the past was as good as it thought itself, or as
bad
as it was thought by its enemies; but, in the past, humanity
could achieve its common purposes in spite of strife, though
haltingly and with temporarily disastrous setbacks. But in
our
age the new cleverness is only compatible with survival if
accompanied by a new wisdom. The wisdom that is needed
is new only in one sense: that it must appeal to masses of
men, and above all, to those who control great power. It is
not new in the sense that it has never been proclaimed
before.
It has been proclaimed by wise men for many ages, but their
wisdom has not been heeded. Now, the time is past when
wisdom could be treated as nothing but the idle dream of
visionaries. Sometimes in the moments when I am most op-
pressed by the fear of coming disaster, I am tempted to
think
that what the world needs is a Prophet who will proclaim,
with a voice combining thunder with the deepest compas-
sion, that the road upon which mankind is going is the wrong
r0 ad a road leading to the death of our children and to the
extinction of all hope but that there is another road which
men can pursue if they will, and that this other road leads
to
a better world than any that has existed in the past. But,
al-
though this vision of a prophet can afford a momentary
consolation, what the world needs is something more
difficult,
more rare. If a prophet were to arise in the East, he would
be
not be heard in the East and in the West would be con-
demned to obloquy. It is not by the action of any one in-
dividual, however great and however eloquent, that the world
can be saved. It can be saved only when rulers and their
followers in the most powerful countries of the world be-
come aware that they have been pursuing a will-o'-the-wisp
which is tempting them only toward ignominious death in a
mire of futile hatred. The collective folly is not yet
universal.
Some nations stand wholly outside it, some are only
partially
victims to it. It is not too late to hope that mankind may
have
a future as well as a past. I believe that if men are to
feel
this hope with sufficient vividness to give it dynamic
power,
the awareness of history is one of the greatest forces of
which
the beneficent appeal must be felt."
No comments:
Post a Comment